linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: fix the skip_if_dup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230831120606.GA6998@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:06:07 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: fix the
 skip_if_dup_files check

On 08/31, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
> On 8/30/23 7:54 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> >I simply can't understand how can this pull/5580 come when I specially
> >mentioned
> >
> >	> 6/6 obviously depends on
> >	>
> >	>	[PATCH 1/2] introduce __next_thread(), fix next_tid() vs exec() race
> >	>	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230824143142.GA31222@redhat.com/
> >	>
> >	> which was not merged yet.
> >
> >in 0/6.
>
> The process in CI for testing is fully automated,

Ah, OK, sorry then.

> >>I suggest you get patch 1-5 and resubmit with tag like
> >>   "bpf-next v2"
> >>   [Patch bpf-next v2 x/5] ...
> >>so CI can build with different architectures and compilers to
> >>ensure everything builds and runs fine.

OK, will do when I have time.

Thanks,

Oleg.