[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98bf616420e4ef3c7c18a1f52fda7cd410137f7d.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:16:54 +0200
From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>,
Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>,
VMware Graphics Reviewers
<linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] string.h: add array-wrappers for (v)memdup_user()
On Thu, 2023-08-31 at 11:59 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:15 PM <pstanner@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 17:29 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 5:19 PM <pstanner@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 17:11 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 4:46 PM Philipp Stanner
> > > > > <pstanner@...hat.com>
> > > Alphabetical.
> > >
> > > compiler.h
> > > err.h
> > > overflow.h
> > > ...the rest that is a bit unordered...
> > >
> > > > > > #include <linux/stdarg.h>
> > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/string.h>
> >
> > I mean I could include my own in a sorted manner – but the existing
> > ones are not sorted:
>
> I know, that's why I put "(to some extent)" in my initial comment.
>
> > We could sort them all, but I'd prefer to do that in a separate
> > patch
> > so that this commit does not make the impression of doing anything
> > else
> > than including the two new headers
>
> But you can do your stuff first with better ordering than you
> proposed
> initially, so there will be less churn for any additional change
> (either that simply unifies the thing or something else).
>
>
I'll take care of those points in a v2 once I gathered some more
feedback from the other parties.
P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists