[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac040329-25a9-121b-b2b4-843b6a8d2a29@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:45:15 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rand Deeb <deeb.rand@...fident.ru>, Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, voskresenski.stanislav@...fident.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ssb-main: Fix division by zero in ssb_calc_clock_rate()
On 30/08/2023 10:27, Rand Deeb wrote:
> In ssb_calc_clock_rate(), the value of m1 may be zero because it is
> initialized using clkfactor_f6_resolv(). This function could return
> zero, so there is a possibility of dividing by zero, we fixed it by
> checking the values before dividing.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Version your patches and provide changelog after --- .
>
> Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <deeb.rand@...fident.ru>
> ---
> drivers/ssb/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> index 0a26984acb2c..e0776a16d04d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> @@ -903,13 +903,21 @@ u32 ssb_calc_clock_rate(u32 plltype, u32 n, u32 m)
> case SSB_CHIPCO_CLK_MC_BYPASS:
> return clock;
> case SSB_CHIPCO_CLK_MC_M1:
> - return (clock / m1);
> + if (m1 !=3D 0)
Nothing improved here.
Don't send patches as quoted-printable via some weird mailers.
Recommendation is to use standard tool - git send-email.
As you can easily see on the web - it is re-formatted for quoted-printable:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230830082759.23336-1-deeb.rand@confident.ru/raw
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists