[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230831151632.124985-5-james.clark@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:16:15 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, irogers@...gle.com
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Haixin Yu <yuhaixin.yhx@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] perf test: Add a test for strcmp_cpuid_str() expression
Test that the new expression builtin returns a match when the current
escaped CPU ID is given, and that it doesn't match when "0x0" is given.
The CPU ID in test__expr() has to be changed to perf_pmu__getcpuid()
which returns the CPU ID string, rather than the raw CPU ID that
get_cpuid() returns because that can't be used with strcmp_cpuid_str().
It doesn't affect the is_intel test because both versions contain
"Intel".
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
---
tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
index 39be7f3b3a53..78544092ef0c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <math.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
+#include <string2.h>
#include <linux/zalloc.h>
static int test_ids_union(void)
@@ -74,10 +75,13 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
int ret;
struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
bool is_intel = false;
- char buf[128];
+ char strcmp_cpuid_buf[256];
+ struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
+ char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
+ char *escaped_cpuid1, *escaped_cpuid2;
- if (!get_cpuid(buf, sizeof(buf)))
- is_intel = strstr(buf, "Intel") != NULL;
+ TEST_ASSERT_VAL("get_cpuid", cpuid);
+ is_intel = strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL;
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("ids_union", test_ids_union(), 0);
@@ -257,9 +261,28 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
TEST_ASSERT_VAL("source count", hashmap__size(ctx->ids) == 1);
TEST_ASSERT_VAL("source count", hashmap__find(ctx->ids, "EVENT1", &val_ptr));
+
+ /* Test no cpuid match */
+ ret = test(ctx, "strcmp_cpuid_str(0x0)", 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Test cpuid match with current cpuid. Special chars have to be
+ * escaped.
+ */
+ escaped_cpuid1 = strreplace_chars('-', cpuid, "\\-");
+ free(cpuid);
+ escaped_cpuid2 = strreplace_chars(',', escaped_cpuid1, "\\,");
+ free(escaped_cpuid1);
+ escaped_cpuid1 = strreplace_chars('=', escaped_cpuid2, "\\=");
+ free(escaped_cpuid2);
+ scnprintf(strcmp_cpuid_buf, sizeof(strcmp_cpuid_buf),
+ "strcmp_cpuid_str(%s)", escaped_cpuid1);
+ free(escaped_cpuid1);
+ ret |= test(ctx, strcmp_cpuid_buf, 1);
+
/* has_event returns 1 when an event exists. */
expr__add_id_val(ctx, strdup("cycles"), 2);
- ret = test(ctx, "has_event(cycles)", 1);
+ ret |= test(ctx, "has_event(cycles)", 1);
expr__ctx_free(ctx);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists