lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:22:50 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@...sung.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] locking/rwsem: Make reader optimistic spinning
 optional


On 8/30/23 23:00, Bongkyu Kim wrote:
> Disable reader optimistic spinning by default. And, can enable it
> by "rwsem.opt_rspin" cmdline.
>
> Also, fix compile error without CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER (reported by
> kernel test robot)
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306010043.VJHcuCnb-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
>   .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt          |  9 +++++++++
>   kernel/locking/rwsem.c                         | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 772b54df084b..adf16a07fe4d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5605,6 +5605,15 @@
>   
>   	rw		[KNL] Mount root device read-write on boot
>   
> +	rwsem.opt_rspin [KNL]
> +			Use rwsem reader optimistic spinning. Reader optimistic
> +			spinning is helpful when the reader critical section is
> +			short and there aren't that many readers around.
> +			For example, enable this option may improve performance
> +			in mobile workload that there're not many readers, but
> +			may reduce performance in server workload that there're
> +			many readers.
> +
>   	S		[KNL] Run init in single mode
>   
>   	s390_iommu=	[HW,S390]
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 9c0462d515c1..de3f173d94d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,19 @@
>   # define DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(c, sem)
>   #endif
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> +static bool rwsem_opt_rspin;

You need to move this definition out of the "ifdef 
CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER" block or a compilation error in 
rwsem_down_read_slowpath() may happen if CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER 
isn't defined. You may also add __ro_after_init to rwsem_opt_rspin.

Cheers,
Longman


> +
> +static int __init opt_rspin(char *str)
> +{
> +        rwsem_opt_rspin = true;
> +
> +        return 0;
> +}
> +
> +early_param("rwsem.opt_rspin", opt_rspin);
> +#endif
> +
>   /*
>    * On 64-bit architectures, the bit definitions of the count are:
>    *
> @@ -1083,7 +1096,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool rwsem_no_spinners(sem)
> +static inline bool rwsem_no_spinners(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>   {
>   	return false;
>   }
> @@ -1157,6 +1170,9 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
>   		return sem;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER) || !rwsem_opt_rspin)
> +		goto queue;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Save the current read-owner of rwsem, if available, and the
>   	 * reader nonspinnable bit.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ