[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANp29Y62czRE-U=a0=ak0AkUv7vKZSECY9pnm74jEAuHRL1sxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:53:29 +0200
From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+d2c31705e468a347e6db@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] general protection fault in netdev_register_kobject
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 5:39 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote:
> > #syz dup: general protection fault in nfc_register_device
>
> Thanks!
>
> Maybe you can improve it to
> 1) drop those prefixes by itself;
Yeah, I've just thought about it too when I was correcting the command.
> 2) explain better in the quick help below what "exact" means.
>
> Also is it possible to test just patches without repository?
> Can you add this feature when you simply submit a message ID
> to it and it uses lore.kernel.org for the patch or series?
Thanks, these are good suggestions!
The first one is easy to do (we actually already support that
internally, so only a small change is needed), the second one is a bit
trickier, but I'll look into that.
>
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 4:13 PM syzbot <
> > syzbot+d2c31705e468a347e6db@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 12:05:53AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>
> > > > #syz dup: [syzbot] [kernel?] general protection fault in
> > > nfc_register_device
> > >
> > > can't find the dup bug
> > >
> > > >
> > > >> If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
> > > >> #syz undup
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > With Best Regards,
> > > > Andy Shevchenko
> > > >
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists