[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB608325D10C22A7EAE1C31C42FCE5A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:04:31 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
CC: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
"Babu Moger" <babu.moger@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 8/8] selftests/resctrl: Adjust effective L3 cache size
when SNC enabled
> So it would look like this:
>
> while ((fscanf(fp, "%x", c)) != EOF ) {
> if (c > 0xF)
> continue;
> count = __builtin_popcount(c);
> }
>
> Are there some problems with an approach like that?
I think I'd prefer something that does more checking on the input
(e.g. the hex numbers are separated by "," and terminated with
a '\n').
If Shuah Khan doesn't like my original patch I can re-write
to use fscanf() et. al.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists