[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230901-headed-unsigned-794833b7b5d5@wendy>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:23:56 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (riscv: ANDES errata)
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 10:33:40PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 8/30/23 20:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please do *not* include material destined for v6.7 in your linux-next
> > included branches until *after* v6.6-rc1 has been released. Also,
> > do *not* rebase you linu-next included branches onto v6.5.
> >
> > Changes since 20230830:
> >
> > The risc-v tree gained conflicts aginst Linus' tree.
> >
>
> On risc-v 32-bit or 64-bit, when CONFIG_MMU is not set:
lkp reported this yesterday too, Prabhakar is conjuring up a fix.
Thanks Randy for the report,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists