[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70ac2967-1f53-2eba-08e2-2fad39630b2e@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:27:33 +0530
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@....com,
quentin.perret@....com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/topology: remove sysctl_sched_energy_aware
depending on the architecture
On 9/1/23 12:21 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Currently sysctl_sched_energy_aware doesn't alter the said behaviour on
> some of the architectures. IIUC its meant to either force rebuild the
> perf domains or cleanup the perf domains by echoing 1 or 0 respectively.
>
Please ignore this mail.
This is duplicate of
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901065249.137242-1-sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists