linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZPHVzRPvstmnIyQj@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2023 15:15:09 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB
 headers

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:29:23PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> I'm removing instances of users of internal GPIOLIB headers which should
> not be included by anyone but GPIO core code. The pinctrl-da9062 driver
> uses gpiochip_get_desc() which we should put into the gpio/driver.h
> header as it does sometimes make sense for GPIO providers to get its own
> descriptors without having to go through gpiochip_request_own_desc().

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko