lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2023 15:15:25 +0300 (EEST)
From:   Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] ASoC: SOF: core: add 'no_wq' probe and remove
 callbacks

Hi,

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:

> With the upcoming changes for i915/Xe driver relying on the
> -EPROBE_DEFER mechanism, we need to have a first pass of the probe
> which cannot be pushed to a workqueue. Introduce 2 new optional
> callbacks.
[...]
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/core.c b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> index 30db685cc5f4b..54c384a5d6140 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> @@ -327,8 +327,6 @@ static int sof_probe_continue(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
>  dsp_err:
>  	snd_sof_remove(sdev);
>  probe_err:
> -	sof_ops_free(sdev);
> -

this seems a bit out-of-place in this patch. It seems a valid change,
but not really related to this patch, right?

We seem to have a related fix waiting to be sent to alsa-devel, by
Peter:
"ASoC: SOF: core: Only call sof_ops_free() on remove if the probe wa"
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/4515

... not yet in Mark's tree.

Otherwise patch looks good to me.

Br, Kai

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ