[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba9803e9-3aff-42b9-87ad-4e6d75d36d87@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 1 Sep 2023 13:30:52 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2] spi: bcm2835: reduce the abuse of the GPIO API
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:15 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> > +       struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup __free(kfree) = NULL;
> Whoa!
> This is really neat.
> As noted, it will confuse static checkers at no end, but they just have
> to adopt. (CC to Dan C if he now runs into this.)
It also doesn't look amazing for humans, it's very not C like...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
