linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/3] resource: Reuse for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230901134217.1172891-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri,  1 Sep 2023 16:42:15 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] resource: Reuse for_each_resource() macro

We have a few places where for_each_resource() is open coded.
Replace that by the macro. This makes code easier to read and
understand.

With this, compile r_next() only for CONFIG_PROC_FS=y.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/resource.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index b1763b2fd7ef..86716cd566e9 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -77,13 +77,6 @@ static struct resource *next_resource_skip_children(struct resource *p)
 	     (_p) = (_skip_children) ? next_resource_skip_children(_p) : \
 				       next_resource(_p))
 
-static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
-{
-	struct resource *p = v;
-	(*pos)++;
-	return (void *)next_resource(p);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 
 enum { MAX_IORES_LEVEL = 5 };
@@ -91,14 +84,26 @@ enum { MAX_IORES_LEVEL = 5 };
 static void *r_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
 	__acquires(resource_lock)
 {
-	struct resource *p = pde_data(file_inode(m->file));
-	loff_t l = 0;
+	struct resource *root = pde_data(file_inode(m->file));
+	struct resource *p;
+	loff_t l = *pos;
+
 	read_lock(&resource_lock);
-	for (p = p->child; p && l < *pos; p = r_next(m, p, &l))
-		;
+	for_each_resource(root, p, false) {
+		if (l-- == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
 	return p;
 }
 
+static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	struct resource *p = v;
+	(*pos)++;
+	return (void *)next_resource(p);
+}
+
 static void r_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	__releases(resource_lock)
 {
@@ -336,7 +341,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
 
 	read_lock(&resource_lock);
 
-	for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p)) {
+	for_each_resource(&iomem_resource, p, false) {
 		/* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */
 		if (p->start > end) {
 			p = NULL;
@@ -1641,13 +1646,12 @@ __setup("reserve=", reserve_setup);
  */
 int iomem_map_sanity_check(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	struct resource *p = &iomem_resource;
 	resource_size_t end = addr + size - 1;
+	struct resource *p;
 	int err = 0;
-	loff_t l;
 
 	read_lock(&resource_lock);
-	for (p = p->child; p ; p = r_next(NULL, p, &l)) {
+	for_each_resource(&iomem_resource, p, false) {
 		/*
 		 * We can probably skip the resources without
 		 * IORESOURCE_IO attribute?
-- 
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b