[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3969ed5a-b422-4b27-bff4-1db38d9d238b@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:34:47 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...hat.com>,
Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@...hat.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] lib/group_cpus.c: avoid to acquire cpu hotplug lock in
group_cpus_evenly
On 8/31/23 3:37 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> group_cpus_evenly() could be part of storage driver's error handler,
> such as nvme driver, when may happen during CPU hotplug, in which
> storage queue has to drain its pending IOs because all CPUs associated
> with the queue are offline and the queue is becoming inactive. And
> handling IO needs error handler to provide forward progress.
>
> Then dead lock is caused:
>
> 1) inside CPU hotplug handler, CPU hotplug lock is held, and blk-mq's
> handler is waiting for inflight IO
>
> 2) error handler is waiting for CPU hotplug lock
>
> 3) inflight IO can't be completed in blk-mq's CPU hotplug handler because
> error handling can't provide forward progress.
>
> Solve the deadlock by not holding CPU hotplug lock in group_cpus_evenly(),
> in which two stage spreads are taken: 1) the 1st stage is over all present
> CPUs; 2) the end stage is over all other CPUs.
>
> Turns out the two stage spread just needs consistent 'cpu_present_mask', and
> remove the CPU hotplug lock by storing it into one local cache. This way
> doesn't change correctness, because all CPUs are still covered.
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists