[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cd3ac9-7ade-1d57-bd78-da78ce0d2cdd@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:46:04 -0700
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<paulmck@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
<damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>,
<daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>, <sandipan.das@....com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <james.morse@....com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bagasdotme@...il.com>, <eranian@...gle.com>,
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, <jarkko@...nel.org>,
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] x86/resctrl: Move default group file creation to
mount
Hi, Reinette,
On 9/1/23 16:36, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Fenghua,
>
> On 9/1/2023 4:21 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>> On 8/21/23 16:30, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> The default resource group and its files are created during kernel
>>> init time. Upcoming changes will make some resctrl files optional
>>> based on a mount parameter. If optional files are to be added to the
>>> default group based on the mount option, then each new file needs to
>>> be created separately and call kernfs_activate() again.
>>>
>>> Create all files of the default resource group during resctrl
>>> mount, destroyed during unmount, to avoid scattering resctrl
>>> file addition across two separate code flows.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 55 +++++++++++++++-----------
>>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>>> index b09e7abd1299..44ad98f8c7af 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>>> @@ -611,5 +611,7 @@ void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
>>> void __init thread_throttle_mode_init(void);
>>> void __init mbm_config_rftype_init(const char *config);
>>> void rdt_staged_configs_clear(void);
>>> +int rdtgroup_setup_root(struct rdt_fs_context *ctx);
>>> +void rdtgroup_destroy_root(void);
>>
>> These two functions are called only in rdtgroup.c. Why are they exposed here?
>>
>
> Could you please take a look at the email thread [1] that
> discusses this? We reached a compromise but would appreciate
> if you have any guidance on the right solution.
Yes, putting the static declarations earlier in rdtgroup.c is right AFAICT.
>
> Reinette
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/972db626-1d74-679d-72f2-3e122f95c314@intel.com/
>
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists