lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 2 Sep 2023 05:44:51 -0500
From:   Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC:     <andersson@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <martyn.welch@...labora.com>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] remoteproc: k3: Split out functions common with M4
 driver

Hi Mathieu,

On 8/29/23 14:47, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch<martyn.welch@...labora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla<hnagalla@...com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>>   - New patch (reordered refactored from v2)
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>   - Removed "ipc_only" element from k3_rproc structure
>>   - Refactored to bring 3 more common functions
>>   
>> Changes since v4:
>>   - None
>>
>>   drivers/remoteproc/Makefile               |   2 +-
>>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c         | 513 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h         | 103 ++++
>>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 598 ++--------------------
>>   4 files changed, 646 insertions(+), 570 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
> This patch is hard to follow because of all the things it does.  Please do the
> structures in one patch and the functions in another.
> 
I will re-structure the patches as you suggested for driver and also 
separate the device tree node patches to avoid clutter.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ