[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <295f0c31-3612-428c-849b-9469a6136f47@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 14:22:53 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>, agross@...nel.org
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
quic_varada@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: ipq5018: Correct uart1_pins pinconf
On 1.09.2023 16:10, Ziyang Huang wrote:
> In pinctrl, the pinconfigs for uart are named "blspX_uartY".
> X is the UART ID. Starts from 1.
> 1-6 are in BLSP Block 1.
> 7-12 are in BLSP Block 2.
> Y is the index of mux config. Starts from 0.
>
> In dts, the serials are also named "blspX_uartY", but with different logic.
> X is the BLSP Block ID. Starts from 1.
> Y is the uart id inside block.
> In "ipq6018.dtsi" and "ipq8074.dtsi", it starts from 1.
> But in "ipq5332.dtsi" and "ipq9574.dtsi", it starts from 0.
>
> +-----------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
> | Block ID | ID inside Block | dts name | pinconfig name |
> | (Starts from 1) | (Starts from 1) | | |
> +-----------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
> | 1 | 1 | blsp1_uart1 | blsp0_uartY |
> | 1 | 2 | blsp1_uart2 | blsp1_uartY |
> | 1 | 6 | blsp1_uart6 | blsp5_uartY |
> | 2 | 1 | blsp2_uart1 | blsp6_uartY |
> | 2 | 6 | blsp2_uart6 | blsp12_uartY |
> +-----------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
>
> In "ipq5018.dts", "blsp1_uart1" (dts name) is the first serial (confimed
> by the address), So its pinconfig should be "blsp0_uart0" (pinconfig name,
> use GPIO 20 and 21) or "blsp0_uart1" (pinconfig name, use GPIO 28 and 29).
Surely only one pair of wires is connected? Why is there an "OR"?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists