linux-kernel - Re: [tip: x86/bugs] x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5D92E1C0-EB00-4D24-AA4F-A616244C32D5@alien8.de>
Date:   Sat, 02 Sep 2023 20:04:07 +0300
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/bugs] x86/srso: Fix vulnerability reporting for missing microcode

On September 2, 2023 1:46:05 PM GMT+03:00, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>Since these are fixes that are supposed to be fully correct,
>I'd suggest we rebase it.
>
>Josh, mind sending a v3 SRSO series, as a replacement for x86/bugs,
>with Boris's review & testing feedback addressed?
>
>[ Feel free to send it as a delta series against v2 in x86/bugs and I'll 
>  backmerge it all. ]

Ok, sounds good. Give  me a while to go through the rest first. I'll let you guys know. Reviewing with a slow, ancient laptop is not the easiest thing in the world...

Thx.

-- 
Sent from a small device: formatting sucks and brevity is inevitable.