[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230902211623.3grw7iiuoraiwimd@zenone.zhora.eu>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 23:16:23 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Huangzheng Lai <Huangzheng.Lai@...soc.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
huangzheng lai <laihuangzheng@...il.com>,
Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] i2c: sprd: Set I2C_RX_ACK when clear irq
Hi Huangzheng,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:45:19PM +0800, Huangzheng Lai wrote:
> We found that when clearing the I2C_TX_ACK bit, the I2C_MODE bit will
where is the I2C_TX_ACK bit cleared?
> also be cleared to 0. When the IIC master reads data, this situation
> will cause the FIFO of the IIC to be empty after clearing the interrupt.
Still I am not understanding the situation. In the clear_irq you
don't seem to do anything with the TX_ACK.
> To address this issue, when clearing interrupts, set I2C_RX_ACK bit to 1,
> as writing 1 to this bit will not take effect.
writing 1 to which bit?
Andi
>
> Signed-off-by: Huangzheng Lai <Huangzheng.Lai@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
> index d867389c7f17..6f65f28ea69d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void sprd_i2c_clear_irq(struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev)
> {
> u32 tmp = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS);
>
> - writel(tmp & ~I2C_INT, i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS);
> + writel((tmp & ~I2C_INT) | I2C_RX_ACK, i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS);
> }
>
> static void sprd_i2c_reset_fifo(struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists