[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230902155850.ca1d32c16862cbe54ebd36ef@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 15:58:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@...omium.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing
exec-related flags
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:13:45 +0200 Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@...oraproject.org> wrote:
> > if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) {
> > - pr_warn_once(
> > + pr_info_ratelimited(
> > "%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n",
> > current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
> Hello Sarai,
>
> i got a lot of messages in dmesg with this. DMESG is unuseable with
> this.
> [ 1390.349462] __do_sys_memfd_create: 5 callbacks suppressed
> [ 1390.349468] pipewire-pulse[2930]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set
> [ 1390.350106] pipewire[2712]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set
OK, thanks, I'll revert this. Spamming everyone even harder isn't a
good way to get developers to fix their stuff.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists