[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023090222-rover-gilled-22d2@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 08:45:31 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kyle Zeng <zengyhkyle@...il.com>
Cc: jlbec@...lplan.org, hch@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configfs: fix a race in configfs_lookup() in
stable-5.10.y
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 05:50:37PM -0700, Kyle Zeng wrote:
> Basically porting c42dd069be8dfc9b2239a5c89e73bbd08ab35de0 to
> stable-v5.10.y to avoid race condition between configfs_dir_lseek and
> configfs_lookup since they both operate ->s_childre and configfs_lookup
> forgets to obtain the lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <zengyhkyle@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/configfs/dir.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/configfs/dir.c b/fs/configfs/dir.c
> index 12388ed4faa5..0b7e9ab517d5 100644
> --- a/fs/configfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/configfs/dir.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ static struct dentry * configfs_lookup(struct inode *dir,
> if (!configfs_dirent_is_ready(parent_sd))
> goto out;
>
> + spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(sd, &parent_sd->s_children, s_sibling) {
> if (sd->s_type & CONFIGFS_NOT_PINNED) {
> const unsigned char * name = configfs_get_name(sd);
> @@ -491,6 +492,7 @@ static struct dentry * configfs_lookup(struct inode *dir,
> break;
> }
> }
> + spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
>
> if (!found) {
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists