[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPTAQWZ0XoL9zfW7@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:20:01 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rajeshwar Shinde <coolrrsh@...il.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mpc512x-psc: Fix an unsigned comparison that
can never be negative
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:12:25PM +0530, Rajeshwar Shinde wrote:
> Remainder
Please read the mail you are replying to...
> On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 5:02 pm Mark Brown, <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:38:48AM +0530, Rajeshwar Shinde wrote:
> > > Please verify this patch.
> > > Thanks & Regards
> >
> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
> > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
> >
> > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > for the subsystem are normally handled.
> >
> > Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows
> > readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> > you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> > discussion is being addressed.
> >
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists