[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230903164122.fb7148f8004402a7552c3ec6@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 16:41:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: memory-failure: use rcu lock instead of
tasklist_lock when collect_procs()
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 10:25:27 +0800 Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com> wrote:
> We found a softlock issue in our test, analyzed the logs, and found that
> the relevant CPU call trace as follows:
>
> ...
>
> By removing the use of tasklist_lock in task list iteration, we can break
> the softlock chain above.
>
So I assume we'd like to backport this fix into -stable kernels?
If so, are we able to identify a suitble Fixes: target?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists