[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230902182828.e42c6ec7b4a7beb1e4b2b042@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 18:28:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...weicloud.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu: Dump vmalloc memory info safely
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 11:04:00 +0000 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> Currently, for double invoke call_rcu(), will dump rcu_head objects
> memory info, if the objects is not allocated from the slab allocator,
> the vmalloc_dump_obj() will be invoke and the vmap_area_lock spinlock
> need to be held, since the call_rcu() can be invoked in interrupt context,
> therefore, there is a possibility of spinlock deadlock scenarios.
>
> And in Preempt-RT kernel, the rcutorture test also trigger the following
> lockdep warning:
"possibility of deadlock" sounds like something -stable kernels would
like to have fixed.
Did you consider the desirability of a -stable backport?
If so, are we able to identify a suitable Fixes: target?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists