[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <290c7e5e-ddbb-c754-240f-a3017fed3801@quicinc.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 17:56:36 +0530
From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: <mani@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_viswanat@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: qrtr: Few qrtr fixes
Hi Simon,
On 9/1/2023 7:49 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 03:50:19PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>> Patch #1 fixes a race condition between qrtr driver and ns opening and
>> sending data to a control port.
>>
>> Patch #2 address the issue with legacy targets sending the SSR
>> notifications using DEL_PROC control message.
>
> Hi Sricharan,
>
> if these are fixes then they should be targeted at 'net' rather than
> 'net-next', and consideration should be given to supplying Fixes tags.
>
There is as such no existing feature broken without these 2 patches
today. Then they might qualify as preparatory patches for adding
some features.
> If these are not fixes, then please don't describe them as such.
> In this case targeting net-next is correct, but it is currently closed,
> as per the form letter below.
>
Sure, then in that case looks like it belongs to 'net-next' and will
post V2 once the net-next is opened again.
> In either case please consider:
>
> * Arranging local variables for new Networking code in
> reverse xmas tree order - longest line to shortest
>
> * Avoiding introducing new Sparse warnings
>
> ok.
> ## Form letter - net-next-closed
>
> The merge window for v6.6 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
> for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
> We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
>
> Please repost when net-next reopens after Sept 11th.
>
ok, sure.
Regards,
Sricharan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists