[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230904-nashorn-gemeckert-3ca91ef71695@brauner>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 10:23:33 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+e245f0516ee625aaa412@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
djwong@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, trix@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [xfs?] INFO: task hung in __fdget_pos (4)
> > Which is pretty much the case for all filesystem bug reports from
I think we should at least consider the option of reducing the number of
filesystems syzbot tests. Filesystems that are orphaned or that have no
active maintainers for a long period of time just produce noise.
Slapping tags such as [ntfs3?] or [reiserfs?] really don't help to
reduce the noise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists