linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: rename gpio_set_debounce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZPWjr7CP+WK064PI@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Sep 2023 12:30:23 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() for
 consistency

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:24:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > 
> > All other functions that manipulate a struct gpio_desc use the gpiod_
> > prefix. Follow this convention and rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() to
> > gpiod_set_debounce_timeout().
> 
> No, that's not true. This one is inline with the other gpio_set() _internal_
> APIs. If renamed, should be done consistently.

It's even broader, like for_each_gpio_desc(). So, looking at that one I would
rather use gpio_desc_ prefix / suffix than gpiod in case you are so eager to
rename (Personally I consider this as unneeded churn). Also consider going
thru all _internal_ APIs, like gpiod_not_found(), to be renamed to
gpio_desc_not_found().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko