[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPWsdjlFvUzeFy45@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:07:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Biju Das <biju.das.au@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: bq24257_charger: Make chip type and
name in sync
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:33:30PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> Add struct bq2425x_chip_info to make enum bq2425x_chip and it's name in
> sync and replace chip->info in struct bq24257_device and add struct
> bq2425x_chip_info as match data for OF/ACPI/ID tables.
>
> Simpilfy probe() by replacing acpi_match_device() and id lookup for
> retrieving match data by using i2c_get_match_data().
>
> Drop bq2425x_chip_name as there is no user and also drop the comment
> related to syncing chip and name as it is taken care by struct
> bq2425x_chip_info.
...
> - if (ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
> - acpi_id = acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table,
> - &client->dev);
> - if (!acpi_id) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to match ACPI device\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - bq->chip = (enum bq2425x_chip)acpi_id->driver_data;
> - } else {
> - bq->chip = (enum bq2425x_chip)id->driver_data;
> - }
Do we still need acpi.h after this change?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists