[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CVAC6ASBH8W5.B7SB98LQT87B@suppilovahvero>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 21:15:04 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Dusty Mabe" <dusty@...tymabe.com>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
<charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>, <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
<len.brown@...el.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"Todd Brandt" <todd.e.brandt@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Don't make vendor check required for probe
On Mon Aug 28, 2023 at 6:47 PM EEST, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 8/18/23 14:15, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > The vendor check introduced by commit 554b841d4703 ("tpm: Disable RNG for
> > all AMD fTPMs") doesn't work properly on Intel fTPM. The TPM doesn't reply
> > at bootup and returns back the command code.
> >
> > As this isn't crucial for anything but AMD fTPM and AMD fTPM works, throw
> > away the error code to let Intel fTPM continue to work.
> >
>
> FWIW there is a Fedora bug where several people are reporting similar issues:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232888
>
> Dusty
I just sent v4 with reported-by's added despite:
1. checkpatch.pl complaining about them
2. no mention of the bugzilla in the kernel documentation at least not
in the sections describing the process handling the patches
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists