[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <303db6b68b5cb4bc73cd0b8c190e3e92498caab3.camel@toradex.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 18:46:24 +0000
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
To: "Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"andrzej.hajda@...el.com" <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
"neil.armstrong@...aro.org" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
"tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com" <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
"peter.ujfalusi@...il.com" <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
"rfoss@...nel.org" <rfoss@...nel.org>,
"airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>,
"francesco@...cini.it" <francesco@...cini.it>,
"jonas@...boo.se" <jonas@...boo.se>,
"jernej.skrabec@...il.com" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
"daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"maxim.schwalm@...il.com" <maxim.schwalm@...il.com>
CC: "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"a-bhatia1@...com" <a-bhatia1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] drm/bridge: tc358768: Attempt to fix DSI
horizontal timings
Hi Tomi
Looks good. Thanks! Tested both on Verdin AM62 as well as on Verdin iMX8M Mini.
Just a minor nit-pick in your code comment further below.
On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 19:19 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> The DSI horizontal timing calculations done by the driver seem to often
> lead to underflows or overflows, depending on the videomode.
>
> There are two main things the current driver doesn't seem to get right:
> DSI HSW and HFP, and VSDly. However, even following Toshiba's
> documentation it seems we don't always get a working display.
>
> This patch attempts to fix the horizontal timings for DSI event mode, and
> on a system with a DSI->HDMI encoder, a lot of standard HDMI modes now
> seem to work. The work relies on Toshiba's documentation, but also quite
> a bit on empirical testing.
>
> This also adds timing related debug prints to make it easier to improve
> on this later.
>
> The DSI pulse mode has only been tested with a fixed-resolution panel,
> which limits the testing of different modes on DSI pulse mode. However,
> as the VSDly calculation also affects pulse mode, so this might cause a
> regression.
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
For the whole series:
Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
> index f41bf56b7d6b..b465e0a31d09 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> #include <linux/media-bus-format.h>
> #include <linux/minmax.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -157,6 +158,7 @@ struct tc358768_priv {
> u32 frs; /* PLL Freqency range for HSCK (post divider) */
>
> u32 dsiclk; /* pll_clk / 2 */
> + u32 pclk; /* incoming pclk rate */
> };
>
> static inline struct tc358768_priv *dsi_host_to_tc358768(struct mipi_dsi_host
> @@ -380,6 +382,7 @@ static int tc358768_calc_pll(struct tc358768_priv *priv,
> priv->prd = best_prd;
> priv->frs = frs;
> priv->dsiclk = best_pll / 2;
> + priv->pclk = mode->clock * 1000;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -638,6 +641,28 @@ static u32 tc358768_ps_to_ns(u32 ps)
> return ps / 1000;
> }
>
> +static u32 tc358768_dpi_to_ns(u32 val, u32 pclk)
> +{
> + return (u32)div_u64((u64)val * NANO, pclk);
> +}
> +
> +/* Convert value in DPI pixel clock units to DSI byte count */
> +static u32 tc358768_dpi_to_dsi_bytes(struct tc358768_priv *priv, u32 val)
> +{
> + u64 m = (u64)val * priv->dsiclk / 4 * priv->dsi_lanes;
> + u64 n = priv->pclk;
> +
> + return (u32)div_u64(m + n - 1, n);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(struct tc358768_priv *priv, u32 val)
> +{
> + u64 m = (u64)val * NANO;
> + u64 n = priv->dsiclk / 4 * priv->dsi_lanes;
> +
> + return (u32)div_u64(m, n);
> +}
> +
> static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> struct tc358768_priv *priv = bridge_to_tc358768(bridge);
> @@ -647,11 +672,19 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> s32 raw_val;
> const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> u32 hsbyteclk_ps, dsiclk_ps, ui_ps;
> - u32 dsiclk, hsbyteclk, video_start;
> - const u32 internal_delay = 40;
> + u32 dsiclk, hsbyteclk;
> int ret, i;
> struct videomode vm;
> struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> + /* In pixelclock units */
> + u32 dpi_htot, dpi_data_start;
> + /* In byte units */
> + u32 dsi_dpi_htot, dsi_dpi_data_start;
> + u32 dsi_hsw, dsi_hbp, dsi_hact, dsi_hfp;
> + const u32 dsi_hss = 4; /* HSS is a short packet (4 bytes) */
> + /* In hsbyteclk units */
> + u32 dsi_vsdly;
> + const u32 internal_dly = 40;
>
> if (mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS) {
> dev_warn_once(dev, "Non-continuous mode unimplemented, falling back to continuous\n");
> @@ -686,27 +719,23 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> case MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888:
> val |= (0x3 << 4);
> hact = vm.hactive * 3;
> - video_start = (vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch) * 3;
> data_type = MIPI_DSI_PACKED_PIXEL_STREAM_24;
> break;
> case MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666:
> val |= (0x4 << 4);
> hact = vm.hactive * 3;
> - video_start = (vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch) * 3;
> data_type = MIPI_DSI_PACKED_PIXEL_STREAM_18;
> break;
>
> case MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666_PACKED:
> val |= (0x4 << 4) | BIT(3);
> hact = vm.hactive * 18 / 8;
> - video_start = (vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch) * 18 / 8;
> data_type = MIPI_DSI_PIXEL_STREAM_3BYTE_18;
> break;
>
> case MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB565:
> val |= (0x5 << 4);
> hact = vm.hactive * 2;
> - video_start = (vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch) * 2;
> data_type = MIPI_DSI_PACKED_PIXEL_STREAM_16;
> break;
> default:
> @@ -716,9 +745,150 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * There are three important things to make TC358768 work correctly,
> + * which are not trivial to manage:
> + *
> + * 1. Keep the DPI line-time and the DSI line-time as close to each
> + * other as possible.
> + * 2. TC358768 goes to LP mode after each line's active area. The DSI
> + * HFP period has to be long enough for entering and exiting LP mode.
> + * But it is not clear how to calculate this.
> + * 3. VSDly (video start delay) has to be long enough to ensure that the
> + * DSI TX does not start transmitting util we have started receiving
until we have started receiving
> + * pixel data from the DPI input. It is not clear how to calculate
> + * this either.
> + */
> +
> + dpi_htot = vm.hactive + vm.hfront_porch + vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch;
> + dpi_data_start = vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "dpi horiz timing (pclk): %u + %u + %u + %u = %u\n",
> + vm.hsync_len, vm.hback_porch, vm.hactive, vm.hfront_porch,
> + dpi_htot);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "dpi horiz timing (ns): %u + %u + %u + %u = %u\n",
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(vm.hsync_len, vm.pixelclock),
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(vm.hback_porch, vm.pixelclock),
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(vm.hactive, vm.pixelclock),
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(vm.hfront_porch, vm.pixelclock),
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(dpi_htot, vm.pixelclock));
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "dpi data start (ns): %u + %u = %u\n",
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(vm.hsync_len, vm.pixelclock),
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(vm.hback_porch, vm.pixelclock),
> + tc358768_dpi_to_ns(dpi_data_start, vm.pixelclock));
> +
> + dsi_dpi_htot = tc358768_dpi_to_dsi_bytes(priv, dpi_htot);
> + dsi_dpi_data_start = tc358768_dpi_to_dsi_bytes(priv, dpi_data_start);
> +
> + if (dsi_dev->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE) {
> + dsi_hsw = tc358768_dpi_to_dsi_bytes(priv, vm.hsync_len);
> + dsi_hbp = tc358768_dpi_to_dsi_bytes(priv, vm.hback_porch);
> + } else {
> + /* HBP is included in HSW in event mode */
> + dsi_hbp = 0;
> + dsi_hsw = tc358768_dpi_to_dsi_bytes(priv,
> + vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch);
> +
> + /*
> + * The pixel packet includes the actual pixel data, and:
> + * DSI packet header = 4 bytes
> + * DCS code = 1 byte
> + * DSI packet footer = 2 bytes
> + */
> + dsi_hact = hact + 4 + 1 + 2;
> +
> + dsi_hfp = dsi_dpi_htot - dsi_hact - dsi_hsw - dsi_hss;
> +
> + /*
> + * Here we should check if HFP is long enough for entering LP
> + * and exiting LP, but it's not clear how to calculate that.
> + * Instead, this is a naive algorithm that just adjusts the HFP
> + * and HSW so that HFP is (at least) roughly 2/3 of the total
> + * blanking time.
> + */
> + if (dsi_hfp < (dsi_hfp + dsi_hsw + dsi_hss) * 2 / 3) {
> + u32 old_hfp = dsi_hfp;
> + u32 old_hsw = dsi_hsw;
> + u32 tot = dsi_hfp + dsi_hsw + dsi_hss;
> +
> + dsi_hsw = tot / 3;
> +
> + /*
> + * Seems like sometimes HSW has to be divisible by num-lanes, but
> + * not always...
> + */
> + dsi_hsw = roundup(dsi_hsw, priv->dsi_lanes);
> +
> + dsi_hfp = dsi_dpi_htot - dsi_hact - dsi_hsw - dsi_hss;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev,
> + "hfp too short, adjusting dsi hfp and dsi hsw from %u, %u to %u, %u\n",
> + old_hfp, old_hsw, dsi_hfp, dsi_hsw);
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev,
> + "dsi horiz timing (bytes): %u, %u + %u + %u + %u = %u\n",
> + dsi_hss, dsi_hsw, dsi_hbp, dsi_hact, dsi_hfp,
> + dsi_hss + dsi_hsw + dsi_hbp + dsi_hact + dsi_hfp);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "dsi horiz timing (ns): %u + %u + %u + %u + %u = %u\n",
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hss),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hsw),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hbp),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hact),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hfp),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hss + dsi_hsw + dsi_hbp + dsi_hact + dsi_hfp));
> + }
> +
> + /* VSDly calculation */
> +
> + /* Start with the HW internal delay */
> + dsi_vsdly = internal_dly;
> +
> + /* Convert to byte units as the other variables are in byte units */
> + dsi_vsdly *= priv->dsi_lanes;
> +
> + /* Do we need more delay, in addition to the internal? */
> + if (dsi_dpi_data_start > dsi_vsdly + dsi_hss + dsi_hsw + dsi_hbp) {
> + dsi_vsdly = dsi_dpi_data_start - dsi_hss - dsi_hsw - dsi_hbp;
> + dsi_vsdly = roundup(dsi_vsdly, priv->dsi_lanes);
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "dsi data start (bytes) %u + %u + %u + %u = %u\n",
> + dsi_vsdly, dsi_hss, dsi_hsw, dsi_hbp,
> + dsi_vsdly + dsi_hss + dsi_hsw + dsi_hbp);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "dsi data start (ns) %u + %u + %u + %u = %u\n",
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_vsdly),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hss),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hsw),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_hbp),
> + tc358768_dsi_bytes_to_ns(priv, dsi_vsdly + dsi_hss + dsi_hsw + dsi_hbp));
> +
> + /* Convert back to hsbyteclk */
> + dsi_vsdly /= priv->dsi_lanes;
> +
> + /*
> + * The docs say that there is an internal delay of 40 cycles.
> + * However, we get underflows if we follow that rule. If we
> + * instead ignore the internal delay, things work. So either
> + * the docs are wrong or the calculations are wrong.
> + *
> + * As a temporary fix, add the internal delay here, to counter
> + * the subtraction when writing the register.
> + */
> + dsi_vsdly += internal_dly;
> +
> + /* Clamp to the register max */
> + if (dsi_vsdly - internal_dly > 0x3ff) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "VSDly too high, underflows likely\n");
> + dsi_vsdly = 0x3ff + internal_dly;
> + }
> +
> /* VSDly[9:0] */
> - video_start = max(video_start, internal_delay + 1) - internal_delay;
> - tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_VSDLY, video_start);
> + tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_VSDLY, dsi_vsdly - internal_dly);
>
> tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DATAFMT, val);
> tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSITX_DT, data_type);
> @@ -826,18 +996,6 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>
> /* vbp */
> tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_VBPR, vm.vback_porch);
> -
> - /* hsw * byteclk * ndl / pclk */
> - val = (u32)div_u64(vm.hsync_len *
> - (u64)hsbyteclk * priv->dsi_lanes,
> - vm.pixelclock);
> - tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HSW, val);
> -
> - /* hbp * byteclk * ndl / pclk */
> - val = (u32)div_u64(vm.hback_porch *
> - (u64)hsbyteclk * priv->dsi_lanes,
> - vm.pixelclock);
> - tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HBPR, val);
> } else {
> /* Set event mode */
> tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_EVENT, 1);
> @@ -851,16 +1009,13 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>
> /* vbp (not used in event mode) */
> tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_VBPR, 0);
> + }
>
> - /* (hsw + hbp) * byteclk * ndl / pclk */
> - val = (u32)div_u64((vm.hsync_len + vm.hback_porch) *
> - (u64)hsbyteclk * priv->dsi_lanes,
> - vm.pixelclock);
> - tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HSW, val);
> + /* hsw (bytes) */
> + tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HSW, dsi_hsw);
>
> - /* hbp (not used in event mode) */
> - tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HBPR, 0);
> - }
> + /* hbp (bytes) */
> + tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HBPR, dsi_hbp);
>
> /* hact (bytes) */
> tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HACT, hact);
Cheers
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists