linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230904125321.f827471daaf0997bf935cccd@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Sep 2023 12:53:21 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2

On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 16:55:38 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:

> It would be good if this series somehow could be tested having some runtime
> from the people.

I grabbed it.  We're supposed to avoid adding new material to -next until
after -rc1 is released, but I've cheated before ;)

That (inaccessible) pdf file is awkward.  Could you please send out
a suitable [0/N] cover letter for this series, which can be incorporated
into the git record?