linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] selftests/sgx: Discard unsupported ELF sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 04 Sep 2023 23:33:11 +0300
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     "Jo Van Bulck" <jo.vanbulck@...kuleuven.be>, <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] selftests/sgx: Discard unsupported ELF
 sections

On Thu Aug 31, 2023 at 4:41 PM EEST, Jo Van Bulck wrote:
> Building the test enclave with -static-pie may produce a dynamic symbol
> table, but this is not supported for enclaves and any relocations need to
> happen manually (e.g., as for "encl_op_array"). Thus, opportunistically
> discard ".dyn*" and ".gnu.hash" which the enclave loader cannot handle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jo Van Bulck <jo.vanbulck@...kuleuven.be>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds
> index 333a3e78fdc9..ffe851a1cac4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ SECTIONS
>  		*(.note*)
>  		*(.debug*)
>  		*(.eh_frame*)
> +		*(.dyn*)
> +		*(.gnu.hash)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>

Also, for any patches (not that many) I've done post-Intel: I hereby
give permission to license that code with MIT or compatible license
as the upper bound.

For any code I've produced while at Intel the copyright is owned by
Intel so perhaps Dave could help with that part?

I'm happy if this code ends up to wider use than just kselftest for
sure.

BR, Jarkko