[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPcqALQ0Ck/3lF0U@gcabiddu-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 14:15:44 +0100
From: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<kees@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<enlin.mu@...soc.com>, <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
<gpiccoli@...lia.com>, <willy@...radead.org>,
<yunlong.xing@...soc.com>, <yuxiaozhang@...gle.com>,
<qat-linux@...el.com>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Yang Shen <shenyang39@...wei.com>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
Weigang Li <weigang.li@...el.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>,
Brian Will <brian.will@...el.com>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] crypto: qat - Remove zlib-deflate
Hi Herbert,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 06:08:47PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Remove the implementation of zlib-deflate because it is completely
> unused in the kernel.
We are working at a new revision of [1] which enables BTRFS to use acomp
for offloading zlib-deflate. We see that there is value in using QAT for
such use case in terms of throughput / CPU utilization / compression ratio
compared to software.
Zlib-deflate is preferred to deflate since BTRFS already uses that
format.
We expect to send this patch for 6.7.
Can we keep zlib-deflate in the kernel?
Thanks,
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/patch/1467083180-111750-1-git-send-email-weigang.li@intel.com/
--
Giovanni
Powered by blists - more mailing lists