[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230905023921.10766-1-wenchao.chen@unisoc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:39:19 +0800
From: Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@...soc.com>
To: <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<wenchao.chen666@...il.com>, <zhenxiong.lai@...soc.com>,
<yuelin.tang@...soc.com>, Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@...soc.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 0/2 RESEND] mmc: hsq: dynamically adjust hsq_depth to improve performance
Change in v3:
- Use "mrq->data->blksz * mrq->data->blocks == 4096" for 4K.
- Add explanation for "HSQ_PERFORMANCE_DEPTH".
Change in v2:
- Support for dynamic adjustment of hsq_depth.
Test
=====
I tested 3 times for each case and output a average speed.
Ran 'fio' to evaluate the performance:
1.Fixed hsq_depth
1) Sequential write:
Speed: 168 164 165
Average speed: 165.67MB/S
2) Sequential read:
Speed: 326 326 326
Average speed: 326MB/S
3) Random write:
Speed: 82.6 83 83
Average speed: 82.87MB/S
4) Random read:
Speed: 48.2 48.3 47.6
Average speed: 48.03MB/S
2.Dynamic hsq_depth
1) Sequential write:
Speed: 167 166 166
Average speed: 166.33MB/S
2) Sequential read:
Speed: 327 326 326
Average speed: 326.3MB/S
3) Random write:
Speed: 86.1 86.2 87.7
Average speed: 86.67MB/S
4) Random read:
Speed: 48.1 48 48
Average speed: 48.03MB/S
Based on the above data, dynamic hsq_depth can improve the performance of random writes.
Random write improved by 4.6%.
In addition, we tested 8K and 16K.
1.Fixed hsq_depth
1) Random write(bs=8K):
Speed: 116 114 115
Average speed: 115MB/S
2) Random read(bs=8K):
Speed: 83 83 82.5
Average speed: 82.8MB/S
3) Random write(bs=16K):
Speed: 141 142 141
Average speed: 141.3MB/S
4) Random read(bs=16K):
Speed: 132 132 132
Average speed: 132MB/S
2.Dynamic hsq_depth(mrq->data->blksz * mrq->data->blocks == 8192 or 16384)
1) Random write(bs=8K):
Speed: 115 115 115
Average speed: 115MB/S
2) Random read(bs=8K):
Speed: 82.7 82.9 82.8
Average speed: 82.8MB/S
3) Random write(bs=16K):
Speed: 143 141 141
Average speed: 141.6MB/S
4) Random read(bs=16K):
Speed: 132 132 132
Average speed: 132MB/S
Increasing hsq_depth cannot improve 8k and 16k random read/write performance.
To reduce latency, we dynamically increase hsq_depth only for 4k random writes.
Test cmd
=========
1)write: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=write -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
2)read: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=read -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
3)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
4)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
5)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=8K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
6)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=8K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
7)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=16K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
8)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=16K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64
Wenchao Chen (2):
mmc: queue: replace immediate with hsq->depth
mmc: hsq: dynamic adjustment of hsq->depth
drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 6 +-----
drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists