[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230905061739.GX11676@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:17:39 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Linux OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Linux Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 6.1.y Regression found on AM3517
* Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> [230905 00:31]:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 11:37:46AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > I have an AM3517-EVM board that I am trying to use the latest 6.1.y
> > stable, currently 6.1.51.
> >
> > With git bisect, I narrowed the regression between 6.1.15 and 6.1.16 to commit
> > eaf9b5612a47 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's
> > consumer links")
> >
> > In the regression, 48002000.scm appears as not ready. This affects a
> > variety of dependent peripherals making them unavailable:
> >
> > wl12xx_buf platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > wl12xx_vmmc2 platform: supplier wl12xx_buf not ready
> > 48050000.dss platform: supplier display@0 not ready
> > 48064800.ehci platform: supplier hsusb1_phy not ready
> > backlight platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > display@0 platform: supplier backlight not ready
> > dmtimer-pwm@11 platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > hsusb1_phy platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > gpio-leds platform: supplier 48002000.scm not ready
> > 480b4000.mmc platform: supplier wl12xx_vmmc2 not ready
> >
> > If I build 6.1.51 but I checkout drivers/base/core.c from commit
> > 2455b81afe68 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Add DL_FLAG_CYCLE support to
> > device links"),
> > the regression is gone.
Adam, maybe check if 6.1 stable series is missing something to be
backported from this mailing list thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230207014207.1678715-2-saravanak@google.com/
That email thread version seemed to work for me based on my reply in the
thread. I recall issues with the earlier revisions but don't remember
what fixed them.
> > I checked the 6.5 kernel, and it appears fine, so I think there is a
> > possible backport commit missing, and I was hoping Saravana or Tony
> > might have a suggestion as to which one(s) I should try. I don't know
> > if this is found on other OMAP3 boards, but I wouldn't be surprised.
> >
>
> Thanks for the regression report. I'm adding it to regzbot as stable-specific
> entry:
>
> #regzbot ^introduced: eaf9b5612a47f0
> #regzbot title: keeping consumer links of child fwnode doesn't prepare AM3517-EVM suppliers
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists