linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 13/25] security: Introduce inode_post

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4bc9dbb2417dc8afe0bf0a50233d4c2968bfb7a.camel@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Tue, 05 Sep 2023 08:51:26 +0200
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        brauner@...nel.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
        neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com, Dai.Ngo@...cle.com,
        tom@...pey.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
        paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
        dhowells@...hat.com, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
        eparis@...isplace.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...r.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/25] security: Introduce inode_post_removexattr hook

On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 00:11 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu Aug 31, 2023 at 1:41 PM EEST, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> > 
> > In preparation for moving IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure, introduce
> > the inode_post_removexattr hook.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xattr.c                    |  9 +++++----
> >  include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h |  2 ++
> >  include/linux/security.h      |  5 +++++
> >  security/security.c           | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
> > index e7bbb7f57557..4a0280295686 100644
> > --- a/fs/xattr.c
> > +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> > @@ -552,11 +552,12 @@ __vfs_removexattr_locked(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> >  	error = __vfs_removexattr(idmap, dentry, name);
> > +	if (error)
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> > -	if (!error) {
> > -		fsnotify_xattr(dentry);
> > -		evm_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name);
> > -	}
> > +	fsnotify_xattr(dentry);
> > +	security_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name);
> > +	evm_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name);
> >  
> >  out:
> >  	return error;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> > index 995d30336cfa..1153e7163b8b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> > @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, inode_getxattr, struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
> >  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, inode_listxattr, struct dentry *dentry)
> >  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, inode_removexattr, struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  	 struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
> > +LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, inode_post_removexattr, struct dentry *dentry,
> > +	 const char *name)
> >  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, inode_set_acl, struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  	 struct dentry *dentry, const char *acl_name, struct posix_acl *kacl)
> >  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, inode_get_acl, struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> > index 820899db5276..665bba3e0081 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/security.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> > @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ int security_inode_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name);
> >  int security_inode_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry);
> >  int security_inode_removexattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  			       struct dentry *dentry, const char *name);
> > +void security_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name);
> >  int security_inode_need_killpriv(struct dentry *dentry);
> >  int security_inode_killpriv(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry);
> >  int security_inode_getsecurity(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> > @@ -919,6 +920,10 @@ static inline int security_inode_removexattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  	return cap_inode_removexattr(idmap, dentry, name);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline void security_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
> > +						   const char *name)
> > +{ }
> 
> static inline void security_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
> {
> }
> 
> > +
> >  static inline int security_inode_need_killpriv(struct dentry *dentry)
> >  {
> >  	return cap_inode_need_killpriv(dentry);
> > diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> > index 764a6f28b3b9..3947159ba5e9 100644
> > --- a/security/security.c
> > +++ b/security/security.c
> > @@ -2354,6 +2354,20 @@ int security_inode_removexattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> >  	return evm_inode_removexattr(idmap, dentry, name);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * security_inode_post_removexattr() - Update the inode after a removexattr op
> > + * @dentry: file
> > + * @name: xattr name
> > + *
> > + * Update the inode after a successful removexattr operation.
> > + */
> > +void security_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
> > +{
> > +	if (unlikely(IS_PRIVATE(d_backing_inode(dentry))))
> > +		return;
> > +	call_void_hook(inode_post_removexattr, dentry, name);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * security_inode_need_killpriv() - Check if security_inode_killpriv() required
> >   * @dentry: associated dentry
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> 
> 
> These odd splits are everywhere in the patch set. Just (nit)picking some.
> 
> It is huge patch set so I don't really get for addign extra lines for no
> good reason.

Thanks for the review, Jarkko.

I don't know... to be honest I still prefer to stay within 80
characters.

Roberto