[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f6390e4-690b-948c-f91b-f99768ba7cf0@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:46:35 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 09/14] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of
MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP
Il 01/09/23 10:09, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> Previously, SCP core 0 controlled the power of L2TCM and dictated that
> SCP core 1 could only boot after SCP core 0. To address this constraint,
> extracted the power control flow of L2TCM and made it shared
> between both cores, enabling support for arbitrary boot order.
>
> The flow for controlling L2TCM power has been incorporated into the
> mt8195_scp_before_load() and mt8195_scp_stop() APIs, which are
> respectively invoked during the rproc->ops->start() and
> rproc->ops->stop() operations. These APIs effectively serve the same
> purpose as the rproc prepare()/unprepare() APIs."
>
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists