[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202309051413.SkL3myiV-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 14:27:43 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Aryan Srivastava <aryan.srivastava@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
andi.shyti@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
aryan.srivastava@...iedtelesis.co.nz, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c:octeon:Add block-mode r/w
Hi Aryan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on wsa/i2c/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.5 next-20230831]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aryan-Srivastava/i2c-octeon-Add-block-mode-r-w/20230905-071739
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230904231439.485925-1-aryan.srivastava%40alliedtelesis.co.nz
patch subject: [PATCH] i2c:octeon:Add block-mode r/w
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230905/202309051413.SkL3myiV-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230905/202309051413.SkL3myiV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309051413.SkL3myiV-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c: In function 'octeon_i2c_hlc_block_comp_write':
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c:725:17: error: label 'ret' used but not defined
725 | goto ret;
| ^~~~
vim +/ret +725 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
674
675 /* high-level-controller composite block write+write, m[0]len<=2, m[1]len<=1024 */
676 static int octeon_i2c_hlc_block_comp_write(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msgs)
677 {
678 bool set_ext = false;
679 int i, j, len, ret = 0;
680 u64 cmd, buf = 0, ext = 0;
681
682 octeon_i2c_hlc_enable(i2c);
683 octeon_i2c_block_enable(i2c);
684
685 /* Write (size - 1) into block control register */
686 len = msgs[1].len - 1;
687 octeon_i2c_writeq_flush((u64)(len), i2c->twsi_base + TWSI_BLOCK_CTL(i2c));
688
689 /* Prepare core command */
690 cmd = SW_TWSI_V | SW_TWSI_SOVR;
691 cmd |= (u64)(msgs[0].addr & 0x7full) << SW_TWSI_ADDR_SHIFT;
692
693 if (msgs[0].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
694 cmd |= SW_TWSI_OP_10_IA;
695 else
696 cmd |= SW_TWSI_OP_7_IA;
697
698 if (msgs[0].len == 2) {
699 cmd |= SW_TWSI_EIA;
700 ext |= (u64)msgs[0].buf[0] << SW_TWSI_IA_SHIFT;
701 set_ext = true;
702 cmd |= (u64)msgs[0].buf[1] << SW_TWSI_IA_SHIFT;
703 } else {
704 cmd |= (u64)msgs[0].buf[0] << SW_TWSI_IA_SHIFT;
705 }
706
707 /* Write msg into FIFO buffer */
708 octeon_i2c_writeq_flush(TWSI_BLOCK_STS_RESET_PTR, i2c->twsi_base + TWSI_BLOCK_STS(i2c));
709 for (i = 0; i < len; i += 8) {
710 buf = 0;
711 for (j = 7; j >= 0; j--)
712 buf |= (msgs[1].buf[i + (7 - j)] << (8 * j));
713 octeon_i2c_writeq_flush(buf, i2c->twsi_base + TWSI_BLOCK_FIFO(i2c));
714 }
715 if (set_ext)
716 octeon_i2c_writeq_flush(ext, i2c->twsi_base + SW_TWSI_EXT(i2c));
717
718 /* Send command to core (send data in FIFO) */
719 octeon_i2c_hlc_int_clear(i2c);
720 octeon_i2c_writeq_flush(cmd, i2c->twsi_base + SW_TWSI(i2c));
721
722 /* Wait for transaction to complete */
723 ret = octeon_i2c_hlc_wait(i2c);
724 if (ret)
> 725 goto ret;
726
727 cmd = __raw_readq(i2c->twsi_base + SW_TWSI(i2c));
728 if ((cmd & SW_TWSI_R) == 0)
729 return octeon_i2c_check_status(i2c, false);
730
731 octeon_i2c_block_disable(i2c);
732 return ret;
733 }
734
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists