linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable non-coherent redistributors/ITSes probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86ledkeqs1.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:41:18 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Fang Xiang <fangxiang3@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable non-coherent redistributors/ITSes probing

On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:30:47 +0100,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:34:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > I came up with the following alternative approach, which is as usual
> > completely untested. It is entirely based on the quirk infrastructure,
> > and doesn't touch the ACPI path at all.
> 
> The patch below makes sense and it is much cleaner - provided we
> consider this a quirk, which I am not sure it is, that's the only
> question I have.

Come on, the whole architecture is a bag of sick hacks. And given that
it makes the change slightly less ugly, I'd rather have that.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.