[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230905191333.never.707-kees@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:13:37 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...ogle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] module: Clarify documentation of module_param_call()
Commit 9bbb9e5a3310 ("param: use ops in struct kernel_param, rather than
get and set fns directly") added the comment that module_param_call()
was deprecated, during a large scale refactoring to bring sanity to type
casting back then. In 2017 following more cleanups, it became useful
against as it wraps a common pattern of creating an ops struct for a
given get/set pair:
b2f270e87473 ("module: Prepare to convert all module_param_call() prototypes")
ece1996a21ee ("module: Do not paper over type mismatches in module_param_call()")
static const struct kernel_param_ops __param_ops_##name = \
{ .flags = 0, .set = _set, .get = _get }; \
__module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, \
name, &__param_ops_##name, arg, perm, -1, 0)
__module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, name, ops, arg, perm, -1, 0)
Many users of module_param_cb() appear to be almost universally
open-coding the same thing that module_param_call() does now. Don't
discourage[1] people from using module_param_call() but clarifying the
comment: module_param_cb() is useful if you repeatedly use the same pair
of get/set functions.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202308301546.5C789E5EC@keescook/
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...ogle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>
Cc: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
Luis, I note that include/linux/moduleparam.h isn't in the MAINTAINERS
file pattern. Perhaps you want to use include/linux/module*.h?
---
include/linux/moduleparam.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
index 962cd41a2cb5..d32450583182 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ struct kparam_array
= { __param_str_##name, THIS_MODULE, ops, \
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(perm), level, flags, { arg } }
-/* Obsolete - use module_param_cb() */
+/* For repeated _set & _get usage use module_param_cb() */
#define module_param_call(name, _set, _get, arg, perm) \
static const struct kernel_param_ops __param_ops_##name = \
{ .flags = 0, .set = _set, .get = _get }; \
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists