linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 12/41] mtd: spi-nor: introduce (temporary) INFO0()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55b60d1204d3550dc5ab17dbbec523b8@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:04:01 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc:     Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/41] mtd: spi-nor: introduce (temporary) INFO0()

Am 2023-09-06 08:04, schrieb Tudor Ambarus:
> On 8/22/23 08:09, Michael Walle wrote:
>> The id will be converted to an own structure. To differentiate between
>> flashes with and without IDs, introduce a temporary macro INFO0() and
> 
> why do we need to differentiate between them?

The INFOn() macros will have a pointer to the SNOR_ID() whereas INFO0()
doesn't have a pointer. Before, it didn't really matter because we
tested for the id_len, but now we'll test the pointer (see next patch).

-michael