lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2023 20:12:08 +0800
From:   Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
To:     Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <louhongxiang@...wei.com>, <lixiaokeng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/19] scsi: core: increase/decrease target_busy
 without check can_queue

On 2023/9/6 7:55, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 9/1/23 4:41 AM, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> This is preparation for a genernal target based error handle strategy
>> to check if to wake up actual error handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 11 ++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> index db0a42fe49c0..4a7fb48aa60f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> @@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ void scsi_device_unbusy(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>>   
>>   	scsi_dec_host_busy(shost, cmd);
>>   
>> -	if (starget->can_queue > 0)
>> -		atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
>> +	atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
>>   
> 
> Ming had found that removing the atomics improves perf.
> Since most drivers didn't care about the target level counters
> it was moved to the can_queue check so only drivers using the
> feature suffer the perf hit.
> 
> Your patch should do the same.
> 
Would update in next version

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ