[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0d30ad4-7837-b0c4-39f4-3e317e35a41b@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 07:45:09 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: j.granados@...sung.com, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
willy@...radead.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] arch/x86: Remove sentinel elem from ctl_table arrays
On 9/6/23 03:03, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
> This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which
> will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time
> memory bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@bombadil.infradead.org/)
>
> Remove sentinel element from sld_sysctl and itmt_kern_table.
There's a *LOT* of content to read for a reviewer to figure out what's
going on here between all the links. I would have appreciated one more
sentence here, maybe:
This is now safe because the sysctl registration code
(register_sysctl()) implicitly uses ARRAY_SIZE() in addition
to checking for a sentinel.
That needs to be more prominent _somewhere_. Maybe here, or maybe in
the cover letter, but _somewhere_.
That said, feel free to add this to the two x86 patches:
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> # for x86
Powered by blists - more mailing lists