linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add ADSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 06 Sep 2023 19:52:32 +0500
From:   Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        David Wronek <davidwronek@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add ADSP

Krzysztof Kozlowski писал(а) 06.09.2023 18:36:
> On 05/09/2023 12:41, Nikita Travkin wrote:
>> sc7180 has an ADSP remoteproc that exclusively controls the audio
>> hardware on devices that use Qualcomm firmware.
> 
> 
>> +					q6afe: service@4 {
>> +						compatible = "qcom,q6afe";
>> +						reg = <APR_SVC_AFE>;
>> +						qcom,protection-domain = "avs/audio", "msm/adsp/audio_pd";
>> +
>> +						q6afedai: dais {
>> +							compatible = "qcom,q6afe-dais";
>> +							#address-cells = <1>;
>> +							#size-cells = <0>;
>> +							#sound-dai-cells = <1>;
>> +						};
>> +
>> +						q6afecc: cc {
> 
> 
> No improvements.
> 
> You need to add ADSP to your board and then test it. Otherwise you won't
> see errors and we do not want incorrect, even if disabled, nodes in DTSI.
> 

Ah, didn't think the check would (partially) ignore disabled nodes...

Is there any simple way to instruct the checker to ignore disabled
status and test anyway? I'd like to be able to test the "clean"
series as-to-be-sent to have less places for error (and manual action
I guess...)

I will make sure to fix that for v3

Nikita

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof