[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230906152325.dblzauybyoq5kd35@revolver>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 11:23:25 -0400
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] maple_tree: Disable mas_wr_append() when other
readers are possible
(Adding Paul & Shanker to Cc list.. please see below for why)
Apologies on the late response, I was away and have been struggling to
get a working PPC32 test environment.
* Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> [230829 12:42]:
> Hi Liam,
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > The current implementation of append may cause duplicate data and/or
> > incorrect ranges to be returned to a reader during an update. Although
> > this has not been reported or seen, disable the append write operation
> > while the tree is in rcu mode out of an abundance of caution.
...
> >
> > Fixes: 54a611b60590 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf
> ("maple_tree: disable mas_wr_append() when other readers are
> possible") in v6.5, and is being backported to stable.
>
> On Renesas RZ/A1 and RZ/A2 (single-core Cortex-A9), this causes the
> following warning:
>
> clocksource: timer@...3b000: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 28958491609 ns
> sched_clock: 32 bits at 66MHz, resolution 15ns, wraps every 32537631224ns
> /soc/timer@...3b000: used for clocksource
> /soc/timer@...3c000: used for clock events
> +------------[ cut here ]------------
> +WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at init/main.c:992 start_kernel+0x2f0/0x480
> +Interrupts were enabled early
Note that the maple tree is involved in tracking the interrupts, see
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c irq_insert_desc(), etc.
> +CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0-rza2mevb-10197-g99b80d6b92b5 #237
I cannot find commit id 99b80d6b92b5.
> +Hardware name: Generic R7S9210 (Flattened Device Tree)
> + unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
> + show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x24/0x3c
> + dump_stack_lvl from __warn+0x74/0xb8
> + __warn from warn_slowpath_fmt+0x78/0xb0
> + warn_slowpath_fmt from start_kernel+0x2f0/0x480
> + start_kernel from 0x0
> +---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> Console: colour dummy device 80x30
> printk: console [tty0] enabled
> Calibrating delay loop (skipped) preset value.. 1056.00 BogoMIPS (lpj=5280000)
>
> Reverting this commit fixes the issue.
I have set up testing with qemu for powerpc 32b, and reverting this
patch does not fix it for me. Did you revert the patch or bisect to the
issue?
It also happens on 0e0e9bd5f7b9 (I ran git checkout cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf^ to
get the commit immediately before cfeb6ae8bcb96ccf). My qemu command is
as follows:
qemu-system-ppc -L pc-bios -boot c -prom-env "boot-device=hd:,\yaboot"
-prom-env "boot-args=conf=hd:,\yaboot.conf" -M mac99,via=pmu -m 2048
-hda powerpc32.img -nographic -kernel <file>
>
> RCU-related configs:
>
> $ grep RCU .config
> # RCU Subsystem
> CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
> # CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT is not set
> CONFIG_TINY_SRCU=y
> # end of RCU Subsystem
> # RCU Debugging
> # CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_REF_SCALE_TEST is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG is not set
> # end of RCU Debugging
I used the configuration from debian 8 and ran 'make oldconfig' to build
my kernel. I have attached the configuration.
>
> CONFIG_MAPLE_RCU_DISABLED is not defined (and should BTW be renamed,
> as CONFIG_* is reserved for kernel configuration options).
Thanks, I'll add it to my list of work.
>
> I do not see this issue on any other platform
> (arm/arm64/risc-v/mips/sh/m68k), several of them use the same
> RCU configuration.
>
> Do you have a clue?
It appears to be something to do with struct maple_tree sparse_irqs. If
you drop the rcu flag from that maple tree, then my configuration boots
without the warning.
I *think* this is because we will reuse a lot more nodes. And I *think*
the rcu flag is not needed, since there is a comment about reading the
tree being protected by the mutex sparse_irq_lock within the
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c file. Shanker, can you comment on that?
I wonder if there is a limit to the number of RCU free events before
something is triggered to flush them out which could trigger IRQ
enabling? Paul, could this be the case?
Thanks,
Liam
View attachment "config-3.16.0-6-powerpc" of type "text/plain" (200901 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists