[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230906090246.v13.2.I4baba13e220bdd24d11400c67f137c35f07f82c7@changeid>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:02:57 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ito-yuichi@...itsu.com,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>, gautham.shenoy@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle
As per the (somewhat recent) comment before the definition of
`__cpuidle`, the tag is like `noinstr` but also marks a function so it
can be identified by cpu_in_idle(). Let's add these markings to arm64
cpuidle functions
With this change we get useful backtraces like:
NMI backtrace for cpu N skipped: idling at cpu_do_idle+0x94/0x98
instead of useless backtraces when dumping all processors using
nmi_cpu_backtrace().
NOTE: this patch won't make cpu_in_idle() work perfectly for arm64,
but it doesn't hurt and does catch some cases. Specifically an example
that wasn't caught in my testing looked like this:
gic_cpu_sys_reg_init+0x1f8/0x314
gic_cpu_pm_notifier+0x40/0x78
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0x134
cpu_pm_notify+0x38/0x64
cpu_pm_exit+0x20/0x2c
psci_enter_idle_state+0x48/0x70
cpuidle_enter_state+0xb8/0x260
cpuidle_enter+0x44/0x5c
do_idle+0x188/0x30c
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
(no changes since v11)
Changes in v11:
- Updated commit message as per Stephen.
Changes in v9:
- Added to commit message that this doesn't catch all cases.
Changes in v8:
- "Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle" new for v8
arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
index c1125753fe9b..05cfb347ec26 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
* ensure that interrupts are not masked at the PMR (because the core will
* not wake up if we block the wake up signal in the interrupt controller).
*/
-void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void)
+void __cpuidle cpu_do_idle(void)
{
struct arm_cpuidle_irq_context context;
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void)
/*
* This is our default idle handler.
*/
-void noinstr arch_cpu_idle(void)
+void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void)
{
/*
* This should do all the clock switching and wait for interrupt
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists