[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPo/z0TaWahjgglT@swahl-home.5wahls.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 16:25:35 -0500
From: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/uv: Use alternate source for socket to node
data
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 01:57:16PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/5/23 08:01, Steve Wahl wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:01:52PM -0500, Steve Wahl wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:18:20AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>> On 8/7/23 07:17, Steve Wahl wrote:
> >>>> When nr_cpus is set to a smaller number than actually present, the
> >>>> cpu_to_node() mapping information for unused CPUs is not available to
> >>>> build_socket_tables(). This results in an incomplete table and will
> >>>> later cause use of a -1 value for some array indexing, and eventual
> >>>> kernel page faults.
> >>>>
> >>>> Switch to using the __apicid_to_node array, which still contains all
> >>>> the information mapping apicids to nodes, even for CPUs disabled with
> >>>> a reduced nr_cpus setting.
> >>> Before, the lookup went:
> >>>
> >>> CPU => APICID => SOCKET
> >>>
> >>> But when the CPU wasn't present, there wasn't a way to start this lookup.
> >>>
> >>> So, instead of looping over all CPUs, looking up their APICIDs and
> >>> mapping those to sockets, just take CPUs out of the equation entirely.
> >>>
> >>> Loop over all APICIDs which are mapped to a valid NUMA node. Then just
> >>> extract the socket-id from the APICID.
> >>>
> >>> Right?
> >>>
> >>> That seems sane enough. It's also way less code than the previous approach.
> >> Yes. That's it precisely. And, yes, way less code.
> > Are you willling to give a "Reviewed-by:"?
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Does this need a stable@ tag when it gets applied?
I hadn't thought about that. I think it meets the requirements in
stable-kernel-rules.rst. And it looks like it should apply without
conflicts or prerequisites. So it probably should. Is there a way to
add a cc:stable tag at this point?
Thank you,
--> Steve Wahl
--
Steve Wahl, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Powered by blists - more mailing lists