[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73b91770-f7f4-3a04-77a9-86eb3332d202@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:32:22 -0700
From: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC: <cristian.marussi@....com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport
On 9/7/2023 9:16 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 18.07.2023 18:08, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>> This change introduce a new transport channel for Qualcomm virtual
>> platforms. The transport is mechanically similar to ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_SMC.
>> The difference between the two transports is that a parameter is passed in
>> the hypervisor call to identify which doorbell to assert. This parameter is
>> dynamically generated at runtime on the device and insuitable to pass via
>> the devicetree.
>>
>> The function ID and parameter are stored by firmware in the shmem region.
>>
>> This has been tested on ARM64 virtual Qualcomm platform.
> What can we test it on?
>
> Konrad
This is being developed for SA8775p platform.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists