[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230907132631.GF10955@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:26:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched: cpufreq: Remove magic margins
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 10:18:50PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> This is probably controversial statement. But I am not in favour of util_est.
> I need to collect the data, but I think we're better with 16ms PELT HALFLIFE as
> default instead. But I will need to do a separate investigation on that.
I think util_est makes perfect sense, where PELT has to fundamentally
decay non-running / non-runnable tasks in order to provide a temporal
average, DVFS might be best served with a termporal max filter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists