lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39736dad-41e3-8b24-ccef-ac3425a6c9f4@loongson.cn>
Date:   Fri, 8 Sep 2023 00:33:13 +0800
From:   suijingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
To:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>,
        Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
Cc:     nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [RFC, drm-misc-next v4 0/9] PCI/VGA: Allowing the user
 to select the primary video adapter at boot time

Hi,


On 2023/9/7 17:08, Christian König wrote:


> I strongly suggest that you just completely drop this here 


Drop this is OK, no problem. Then I will go to develop something else.
This version is not intended to merge originally, as it's a RFC.
Also, the core mechanism already finished, it is the first patch in this series.
Things left are just policy (how to specify one and parse the kernel CMD line) and nothing interesting left.
It is actually to fulfill my promise at V3 which is to give some examples as usage cases.


> and go into the AST driver and try to fix it. 

Well, someone tell me that this is well defined behavior yesterday,
which imply that it is not a bug. I'm not going to fix a non-bug.
But if thomas ask me to fix it, then I probably have to try to fix.
But I suggest if things not broken, don't fix it. Otherwise this may
incur more big trouble. For server's single display use case, it is
good enough.


Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ